As a life-long marketer and consumer behavior professor, it’s interesting to observe how people’s opinions change as details of an issue become more apparent. Behavioral change — once information and knowledge increases — is common among people who are open-minded, educated and critical thinkers.
For example, a YouGov/Economist poll noted that when President Donald Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” was announced, only 43% of Americans opposed the 2025 budget package. In less than two weeks after the House passed the 1,116 page bill and citizens learned more about its contents, the disapproval rating shot up to 55%.
Even Elon Musk, Trump’s top presidential campaign financier and MAGA loyalist, slammed Trump’s tax and domestic policy bill in a June 3 post on his social media platform X by stating “This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.” You might like to know that 84% of conservative Republicans hold a favorable view of Elon Musk (Pew Research Center) and 219.9 million Americans follow Musk’s X/Twitter account.
Besides the megabill increasing America’s budget deficit by $2.4 trillion, citizens’ top 10 concerns are noted here. The most disconcerting aspect of the omnibus bill is listed last as it undermines the checks and balances system that ensures separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branches Americans have revered for the past 250 years.
The impact to democracy of the 10th identified component of Trump’s legislation justifies further explanation. This provision restricts the ability of federal courts to enforce their rulings against the government and impose contempt of court citations. This is significant in that this clause means Trump and his appointees — plus future presidencies — could ignore court rulings and, in essence, convert America to a dictatorship. (P.S.: On April 1, Mr. Trump referred to himself as “King of America.”)
Legal experts warn this proviso dramatically weakens judicial authority and make many existing and future court orders unenforceable. This stipulation undermines America’s checks and balances between the three branches of government, a cornerstone of the U.S. Constitution.
Congress’s parliamentarian may decide Section 70302 is not permitted in the bill since it does not have a financial component (referred as the “Byrd rule.”) However, the GOP-controlled Senate could overrule the parliamentarian’s decision.
Despite 55% of citizens being opposed to Trump’s megabill that carries a $2.4 trillion price tag and even though the House has passed the measure in its current form, it is imperative to contact your two senators and representative at the Capitol (202-224-3121) and at the very least, request Section 70302, which refers to judicial oversight, be stricken.
Section 70302 alone in the measure says that democracy is in jeopardy for you, your children and grandchildren. If the bill passes with section 70302 intact, an authoritarian, totalitarian and fascist-oriented America is almost assured in perpetuity.
Steve Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing of University of Northern Iowa.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here